Security and resilience

Security and resilience

BS ISO 22341:2021 pdf free.Security and resilience – Protective security – Guidelines for crime prevention through environmental design.
The organization should:
— choose the scale, function and blending of functions to provide an incentive for liveability, social control, involvement and sense of ownership for CPTED strategies In the planning stage;
— implement planning stage strategies to prevent the existing urban environment from being harmed and, in the case of an emerging threat such as a vehicle bomb threat flexibly adopt this strategy;
— create strategies for the conditions for the formation of social networks and making a new development part of the existing surrounding urban environment as much as possible;
— minimize isolated places and avoid blind/entrapment spots of buildings and planted areas that have low visibility from nearby.
The organization should:
— consider the social structure, such as socio-economic and demographic characters of a site in order to reflect its specific context;
— enhance the vitality of public space for the site by considering active land use, density and (human) scale;
— consider properly connected street segments and integrated land uses (rather than disconnected and segregated patterns);
— consider cautious ecological placement of green spaces and parks for an area;
— consider cautious placement of lighting and, if necessary, security cameras for an area;
— consider anti-terrorism building and landscape planning for particular target sites;
— consider the security and crime prevention of the construction site against attacks (e.g. the misuse of land and building for grouping of offenders, drug trafficking or stolen goods, prostitution, theft of tools, material and building machines, trucks.) during the CPTED planning stage as construction development often lasts for a few years until building completion.
NOTE Table I provides additional and detailed information with examples on CPTED strategies for the planning stage.
5.2.3 CPTED strategies for design stage
The organization should:
— evaluate the external and internal situational context of CPTED-related risks;
— understand what factors significantly influence the risk and the effectiveness of countermeasures.
Evaluating the external situational context of the risk includes:
— the social and cultural, political, legal, regulatory, financial, technological, economic, natural and competitive environment, whether international, national, regional or local;
— key drivers and trends having an impact on the objectives of the organization;
— relationships with, and the perceptions and values of, external interested parties.
Evaluating the internal situational context of the risk includes:
— governance, organizational structure, roles, responsibilities and accountabilities;
— policies and objectives, and the strategies in place to achieve them;
— capabilities, understood in terms of resources and knowledge (e.g. capital, time, people, processes, systems, technologies);
— relationships with, and the perceptions and values of, internal interested parties;
— the organization’s culture;
— standards, guidelines and models adopted by the internal interested parties.
The organization should aim at creating the conditions for social control, natural surveillance, a sense of ownership and pride in an area for the design stage CPTED strategies.
The organization should integrate the CPTED design strategies as part of the planning and design phase. The organization should:
— enhance the visibility of streets and buildings by proper building, landscaping and lighting design;
— enhance the access control of a site through gates, fences and walls, or entry/exit barriers tested and certified by relevant security performance standards;
— harden soft target sites/buildings (in addition to traditionally hardened sites) through security equipment certified by relevant security performance standards;
— consider the territoriality of a site by clear demarcation between public space, semi-public space, semi-private space and private space to create buffer zones and to enhance sense of ownership;
— consider the attractiveness/aesthetics of a site in order to create positive area image and active land use by attractive public art and lighting;
— consider clear signage with a proper colour scheme and legibility;
— consider the robustness of street furniture in order to resist vandalism attacks and to facilitate maintenance.
5.2.4 CPTED strategies for site and social management stage
The organization should:manage target areas by professional surveillance and maintenance;
implement the management strategies and support, encourage the natural surveillance and sense of ownership by residents and visitors, and not discourage residents from performing this task;
assume a certain level of self-regulation, which can be elevated to a higher level with professional support for the management strategy;
6 Process of CPTED implementation
6.1 General
The organization should mandate CPTED as a design standard as part of a continual improvement process for community/site/building security, safety and quality of life, and not just for the installation of security cameras and murals. The organization should implement a step-by-step process involving all relevant interested parties.
The organization should:
— follow the risk management framework given in ISO 31000 to integrate risk management into CPTED activities and programmes;
— develop the framework following clear decision steps to set a strategy, taking into account the responsibilities of all interested parties involved;
— ensure that CPTED strategies are addressed by the multiple interested parties to adequately manage risk through developing partnering arrangements.
NOTE 1 There are many different roles and responsibilities within and between public, private and not-for- profit organizations.
NOTE 2 ISO 22397 provides principles and a process to develop the relationship among organizations in a partnering arrangement.
The process of CPTED is given in Figure 3.
The organization should:
— ensure that framework development encompasses integrating, designing, implementing, evaluating and improving risk management across the organization for CPTED leadership and commitment;
— encourage interested parties to initiate a regular planning/management process resulting in the building of a new area or rebuilding, refurbishment or maintenance of an existing area;
— incorporate this document to prevent and reduce crime and the fear of crime in the regular planning/management process;
— define in documented procedures the responsibilities and requirements for planning and conducting evaluation, and for reporting results and maintaining records;
— follow the general principles of CPTED process for continual security improvement for community.
6.2 Oversight body, performance target statement and project team
An authority responsible for granting permission for developments in new and/or existing environments are referred to this document as an uoversight body”. Local or regional authorities may delegate their planning permission responsibilities to another expert group, institute or corporation, in which case the delegated group, institute or corporation will be the oversight body.
The organization should require top management and oversight bodies, where applicable, to ensure that risk management is integrated into all organizational activities and to demonstrate leadership and commitment.BS ISO 22341 pdf download.Security and resilience

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *